HomeMy WebLinkAbout0329 ~ . -~0100
n~ ~ cu~curr ao~rr oF ~
JiIDICIAL CIR(~RT
IN AI~ID ~Jit ST . L1lCIE OOI~IY
STA'IE OF FZARILIA
~TT~ g~ CNII. DMSION .
OQ~ANY, an Ohio Corporatiari, -
et al., Case No. 77 11 CA
Plaintiffs,
vs
RI(~~RD L. OONWAY, d/b/a
OOI~1f~lAY OONSiRiJG'T'ION,
Defesndants .
ORDIIt OF OONT'II~[JANCE
T1~i.s cause, cam~ng on to be heard before me o~n January 3, 1978 ~ upcm Motion
for Cantirnrznce filed by the Plaintiffs, and this Ca~t being fully advised in the
pre~d.ses, it i.s uQcm oorc~sid~eration ~
pRDIItID A1~ID AATUDC~ that the Motion for Cantirn~ance be and is herebY granted.
~is cause is reroved fram this Caurt's present trial docket, and shall be reinstated
to a subseque~nt trial docket t~an M~tion by airy PartY for trial.
DOI~ A1~ID ~D~RID in Fort Pierce , Saint Lt3cie Co~ty , Florida , this '
day of Jarwary, 1978.
~
~ ,
f
~ C JtIDGE .
;
~
~ Copy provided:
~ JaQnes J. 8utler, Esq. ~ .
~
~
~
~ f~4 UO~R~O~NiY~i~
~ _ ~vaER P~~,~~5 _ ~100
~ _ ~ f 'C111T CC~r~T
~ . .~;-p..r
~ ,J~N 10 9 4u AN'~p
ti
~
~
~
~
...3
~
>3
,'..l
-~c
6GOK~u~ PAGE ~~~3
- •
: - - - _ ~
- s ~4~
N ~
~ ~ _ , . _ . r `