HomeMy WebLinkAbout0336 ~010~ - - i
~ I
~
;
~ IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR (
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ~
!
CASE NO.: 76-128 CA ~
~
~i FALSTAFF BREWING CORPORATION ~
I
a Delaware Corporation, +
I
Plaintiff, '
~ ~
;
vs . i
r:
FEED AND GRAIN CORRAL, INC., a ~
Florida Corporation, !
~
,
; ~ Defendant. ~
~
~
i
;
I
i
~ ORDER DIRECTING VERDICT FOR PLAINTIFF ;
~
i~ THIS MATTER having come on before me for trial by `
i l
Jury, the Plaintiff having moved for a directed verdict at ; `
~ i
the conclusion of evidence, the Court having ~d the G' T~
~ ~
~
testimony, having the benefit of argument from counsel and ~
` being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ~
; '
t ,
t ORDERED ArID ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff, FALSTAFF BREWING~
;
x
~ CORPORATION'S l4otion for Directed Verdict on the Counterclaim
~ .
of the Defendant, FEED AND GRAIN CORRAL, INC., is hereby ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ granted and the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, FALSTAFF.BREWING ;
1 ~
~ ~
~ CORPORATION shall~go hence without day. ~
~
~ i
~ ' DONE AND ORDERED at Martin County, Sturat, Florida, {
~ ~ ~1
~ this ~Z/~ day of January, A. D., 1978. ~
I
~
~ ~
~ , .
~ ~ ,
~ ~
~ C C GE `
~
~ . ~
~
< copies furnished counsel: ;
. ~
= Bradford L. Jefferson, Esquire -~p~y~ ~
Rupert J. Smith, Esquire '~1~ -
!
i1t.to a~a ~~cv.~~f c ;
sT 1tlC)t COU1rTr fE s
- ~~~:F =?~T?e5
f „K :GJ:T ~.^•t,,' ' '
• =1:. ~
_ ~
; (tt~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~ ~
- 1
`
_ , ;
'.y~ • ;
~
~ ~ i
~ a~aK 2~U ~Nc~ 33~ M
~ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_ ~ ~ ~
~ ~i
~ ~ _ _ ~
~ _ r. _ r _ . - : ~ _w~