HomeMy WebLinkAbout0098 Wife.
In arriving at these sums, the Court has considered the dif-
ficulty of the litigation and the fact that both parties have been
,
held in contempt but no sanctions have been imposed either past or
present. The Court has also taken into consideration and applied
the criteria for fixing~the amount of counsel fees outlined by the
Supreme Court of Florida in Prows v. Provus, 44 So. 2nd 656, viz :
services rendered, responsibility incurred. the nature
of the services, the skill required, the circumstances
under which it was rendered, the ability of the liti-
gants to respond, the value of the services to the ~
- client, and the beneficial results, if any, af the
services
and it is therefore ORDFRED AND ADJUDGED:
1~ That the Husband LAUREN MOORE DELEHANT is ordered to pay
to Spencer Gilbert, Esquire, the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00)
.for which let execution issue.
2. That the Husband LAUREN MOORE DELEHANT is ordered to pay
to Vincent A. Lloyd, Esquire, the. sum of Five Thousand Dollars
I ($S,OOO.QO) for which let execution issue.
I
~ 3. That the Husband LAUREN MOORE DELEHANT is ordered to pay
~ . -
! to R. Patrick Beatty, Esquire, the sum of Five Thousand Dollars
($5,000.00) for which let execution issue.
~
~ The Court retains jurisdiction as to the.matter of costs and
~ as to the matter of attorneys' fees in the event this sale is not
~
closed or the property must be partioned. l
Ja~~~~
DERED in Chambers in ~ County,
DONE AND OR
~ ~
Florida, this day of February, 1978.
~
~ ~
~ , ' ^
~ '
v
~ J of the~ ircuit Court
~
~ cc: Vincent A. Lloyd, Esq. f lEOANDREC4R0E0
~ IUCtE COUMTY FLA.
F Richard D. Sneed, Jr. , Esq. ROGER POtTRAS
-2- ~~FRK CI~~UlT COU t
~ - - 1rFtitEO
~ ~ FEB Is Ik ~'~s
~c
~
~ ~
~ . . fl R 3s~x,~
~ eo~~ 282 ~ar:f 98
~
x : _ - - _ _ ~
.-~-a-~. ~ '.~~s_ ~ ~ ~~ir e., . M_ ~ . . ah