HomeMy WebLinkAbout0663 "subject to veing reset by the Court upon notice of any inter=
ested party." Said.Order also confiraned that two of the peti-
tioners, including CARL CARLTON, have not withdrawn their Peti-~
tion. •
6. Since the original Petition for Removal was filed, and
. since the par.tial trial of the issues framed thereby,-certain
other matters have come to the attention of Petitioner, CARL
CARLTON, which require this amendment to the original Petition
for Removal. These matters are:
A. Further examples of the conflicting interest and
~ adverse interest held by the Administrator or its officers and
their~close relatives against the Estate and the best interests
- of the heirs at law includes: .
(1) The Administrator loaned.the Estate certain ~
monies after becoming Administrator at a higher rate of
- ~ interest than they could have..gotten from the State or
Federal Governments. The administrator and attorneys
were reprimanded concerning this matter during a Court
hearing, the Honorable E. Harris Drew remarking that the
Administrator was doing business with itself.
; (2) The Administrator caused a Ford automobile
;
~ ~ that belonged to the Estate to be -sold through one of
I - -
~ its directors, Don Reed, a General Motors dealer, instead
~ of using a Ford Company dealer, who could have realized
more money for the estate. - ~
~ B. Further examples di the wast~.ng or other mal-
administration of the said Estate are as follows:
(1) Among the assets owned-by the Estate
as of April 30, 1971, was $198,232.00. The Admini-
~ strator in filing the.return wherein they were re-
~ quired to reflect all assets so owned by the Estate,
~ the Administrator failed to report said asset. An
, i
~ amendment to the return was thereafter filed; however,
this shows mismanagement and carelessness by the
Administrator.
-2-
. S~u~i ~~O P~Cc V~
_ _ ~ ~ ~
~ v ~ ~ . . - .
_ _ .SH . .~~sM . . . . ~ . _ _ " . _