HomeMy WebLinkAbout1215 7 9 16~
7W 'fi4: ta~lll~l' cil: fYK•".~ ~iJ 1'T~~J1.S O_F
791r~ i•~a'1"i-':'illlil~ .!~~i~l~:litl. I)f:"JitCCT
NN!:I!iUt CV:iri'i !.!i.1l.~t;i! c.~il'i41f3:~ COlliiT
i)11/LSIOtJ
In lt~•:
I~:~L'rL~•, of
GcOr~,c' lt. Heider arxJ •
Marie A. Hensler, his wife No. 10150-78
alleged inco:r~etents '
~ -
ORDFR
AND ?10W, this ~ day of November, 1978, hearing in this case •
having been held on tJove.*nber 8, 1978, the Court f'ir~ds from positive
T
testimony that the welfare of George W. Hensler ar~d Marie A. Hensler '
would not be promoted by their presence in Court at said hearing, and
the Court further finds from the testimony that the said George W.
Hensler arcs t~`ari e A . Jiensler are unable to manage their property, are
likely to dissipate the same or become the victims of designing persons;
it is, therefore, ORDff~ID arr3 DIRECTI•~ that George W. Hensler and Marie
j A. Hensler, his wife be and are ad~ud~;Pd incompetents and that Kirby
~ -
! Uprigrit is ar>1'~oint,eci gu:~riian of their e:~tates. -
.1
~ -
_ ?
. By The- t
t ~
~ _ -
r
: ~ D AI'JD r~EC4RDEb'
. • y r ~ ~E RECORD F.I.E
_
c- .f ~ 1` --i,
G - : J?rochY. cle.k 43044'7
•
T
C~E~Y..,
Be~K PAGE
°R301 1210
ICI
yrl~~ _
0. 'n7 ~