HomeMy WebLinkAbout1224 . v. .
i
i
79 : 15:
7N i1(I: t:rAlltl' C?I~ fx~•"•>>i1 1'T,1~.11.`~ OF
'111; i'~aa"i=:7111iU .~?~'.~'.~'t:~l. 111:"19ilCT j
M'?iI~U1-C~~:~~ti`I l.Gtik:it~•- i~::i'IG1tl~ (`OUf+<T • ,
t)1VISIl~tJ ~ •
i -
t
a
- i
t ~a cam:: o f r
C~~or~,e W. ficn:ac•r vr.i
M3r•ie A. 1l~rt?~Lct•, h1s wife No. 10150-78 ~ _ -
• al.le^ecl incanpctents _ ! ~
;
• j
~
. ORD1~R
?
I` 'Z{
AND t1aW, this ~ day of Noven>her, 1978, he~'~ ~ this case ~
having been held on ?,fove<nber 8, 1978, the Court fitxls from positive
W. Hensler and Marie A. Hensler
testirat~y that the welfare of George ;
would not be prot,rtoted by their presence in Court at said hearing, and •..i
the Court further finds from the testimony that the said George W•
Hensler and Marie A. Hensler are unable to manage their pzoperty, are
' likely to dissipate the same or become the victi><rts of desigRirtg persons; ~
~ it is, therefore, ORD);RID and DII1flCI'1~ that George W. Hensler acrd Marie
t }
~ A. fIensler, his wife be atxi are a<1tijt.tclfed incotrQ~etents and that Kirby ~ - _
( Uprigr?t is ar>f~ir?Lcci lv:udl:ut of ttN~it• e~::t3tcy. t
I
~ I -
• - ,
ay The t : ;
~ -
`j
- i
?
i
. -
;v .~Q r~Jrn~~~ ~ 1
- C~` _ - ,
• _ ~ 19 of
~ ~ - - • r
t
x.
_Y. -s-;
aeac~1 ~,?cf~~9
•
- ~ f~
-