HomeMy WebLinkAbout2969 • J
with instructions for levy, the Sheriff of St. Lucie_
County levied on certain real property awned by Petitioner,
Ideal Ranch Development~Corporation, which property is
legally described as follows:
The SE 1/4 of the NS 1/4 of Section
10 Township 34-?S aange 39-E; less the E
75 Feet along and parallel to the E. Section -
line of said section;and less the E. 300
feet of the W 930 feet of the N 1/2 of the
~ 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said
section; and less the E 150 feet of the W
1080 feet of the N 1/2 of the S 1/2 of The
SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said section. And the
N 1/2 of the N 1/2 of.the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4
of Section 10; Township 34-S, Range 39-E;
less-the W. 46 feet along and parallel to the
- v - S 1/4 Section line of-said section. And the E.
1115 feet of the S 1/2 of the N 1/2 of the
. - SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 10 Township
34-5, Range 39-E. And the S 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the ~
NE 1/4 of Section 10, Township 34-S, Range
- ~ 39-E; less the W 46 feet along and parallel
to the N-S 1/4 Section line of said section.
_ And the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 10,
Township 34-S, Range. 39-E; less the E 75 feet along
and parallel to the E section line of said section;
and less the W 46 feet along and parallel to
-the N-S 1/4 section line~of said section.
4. At no-time was~Ideal Ranch Development Corporation
provided with notice of the. sale as is required by Florida
Statute Section 56.21.
- 5. Prior to the sale, Ideal Ranch Development
Corporation discharged part of the .obligations due under
the writ of execution and satisfied the cost judgment
_entered by this Court embodied in that certain order
i -
taxing costs dated January 6, 1978.
~ 6. At no time was the Sheriff of St. Lucie County
.notified that respondent, Ideal Ranch Development
Corporation had paid Manuel Arvesu the cost judgment
referred to above but the Sheriff of St. Lucie County
apparently levied on the real property with the assumption
that no part of the writ had been discharged.
7. The value of the real property described above
exceeds $350,000.00 and the court finds. in addition to
the above, that the bid made at the sale were inadequate.
~ _
8. That the sale held~by the Sheriff of St. Lucie
E
"~~i~ ,s: { 65~ ~ooK~02 ~A~E2966
~0~
~r ' }