HomeMy WebLinkAbout1960 t
i
~ / !
+ -
• 43~69Z
1 II~T TH8 DI8TRICT COUAT OB TBS SIGHTS JUDIC ~ 9Fr
2 STATE OP MONTANA, Itd AND FOR T88 C O ~ , i ~ • ~ ~ -
3 ~ ~ AP ]4 ~#i
4 ~ IN RS THS PlARRIAGE O!' ) Fi.4AENCE A~cGIBONEY
Q •BRt1CS F. OLSOi~, ; tiEN i ~ ',N~LD~L~'r~ C"a3st ~ - .
. DEPU'T`Y _ :j
d Petitiones, No. 82661 C
7 and ) DECR$8 OF
_ ) DISSOLUTION
6 JOYCS 8. OISON, ; -
o Respondent. )
10 petitioa~tor dissolution o! the. above marriage came on for
11 hearin on motion this ly day o! ~ . /5'~ , 1977.
12
Petitioner appeared"with counsel, was sworn and testified.
13 ' -
From evidence-presented, the court now finds:
14 - - -
- ~ FINDINGS - t
13 : ~ ~ -
1. That petitioner and respondent were married at New
16
Hraunfells, Texas, on the 14th day o! Marsh, 19691 .
17
2. That respondent is not pregnant -
16 3. That petitioner has alleged and respondent has not
19 denied that the marriage of the parties is irretrievably brokeat
20
4. That the marriage is irretrievably broken in that there
21
is serious marital discord which adversely affects the attitude
i 22
E of one or both o! the parties towards the marriages
2S .
5. -That petitioner has bees domiciled within the State of
~ 24
F Montana for ninety (90) days next preceding the making of these
za
f ind f nqs by -the Court t
28 -
6. That respondent-was served with petition for dissolution
2? .
on the 18th day of February, 1977, and respondent has appeared ia.
28
~ this cause by way of rc~tion and stipulations -
29
7. -That there is no reasonable prospect of reconciliation
~ gO ~ t
~ 31 between the parties hereto- 1
32 8. That the children of the marriage were born•durinq
seat ~ pa~1~7
-
s
- - -y a,. r{ z-.s. -
f
- -
-