HomeMy WebLinkAbout0962 ~;35943
' . IN 7~ CI~.UIT OC~JRT IN Ai~ID FC~2 ~
ST. I~7CIE ~iJ1~T1'Y, FI.URID~1
t
CASE ND. 78-521 CA ,
i
.
CZTY CF F'QnP P~CE
Plaintiff ~
f
vs .
~
;
~1~ 4
~CJ 1liCai lt
t
~
~
~
FINAL JUDGML'NT OF EVICTION '
THIS CAUSE having come on for trial on the 20th day
of February, 1979 and continuing through the 22nd day of ,
February, 1979, and it appearing to the Court that a jury was duly ~
impaneled and sworn in accordance with the law, and after reviewing
various documents introduced into~evidence, and after hearing
`
testimony af the Plaintiff and its individual witnesses, and the
;
z
testimony of the Defendant and his individual witnesses, and the ;
, ;
. ;
argument of counsel, and the charge of the Court, the jury retired
to consider their verdict and upon returning it to open Court,
~
ordered the following verdict: ~
~ ~ JURY VERDICT
• ;
"We find for the Plaintiff on the claim for eviction. _
~
SO SAY WE ALL.
r
~ DATED this 22nd day of February A.D., 1979.
''s
s
~ /S/ RICHARD B. HELLSTROM
Foreperson" :
~ ;
~ Said verdict having been duly filed and entered upon the records
~
~
~ of the Court, it is thereupon:
~
~ ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff, CITY OF FORT
~
~
~ PIERCE, shall have and take possession of any berth, slip,
~
~ space or premises at the CITY OF FORT PIERCE, CITY !KARINA now
in possession of the Defen~ant, MEL ELKII~S; and it is hereby
~
FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant, MEL
;
- ELKINS, is to remove his 64' boat from the CITY OF FORT PIERCE "
~ CITY MARINA prior to March 1, 1979; and it is hereby
;z
~
FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUGED that if the Defendant, MEL
~
~ ELKINS, does not remove his boat from the CITY OF FORT PIERCE
' CITY MARINA prior to March 1, 1979, then the Plaintiff, CITY OF .
ORENNAN, McALILEY, MAYSKAR b McALIIEY, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, 519 SOUTH INOIAN RIVER DR., iORT PIERCE, FLA. 33450
~ gC`~r 3U4 jA~';. J6~ I
, ~
~~.._w .