HomeMy WebLinkAbout2348 1 ~
under Lease 248 as a working interest, which is Lake Okeechobee,
and in Coastal's'working interest in Leases 224-A and 224-B,
which is an area three miles wide landward from the outside
of the three league Federal-State boundary and extending the
full length of Leases 224-A and 224-B.
3. The claims in this case are susceptible of an
equitable adjudication.' Mobil is entitled to the same one-
half interest in the leases as a matter of equity.
4. Mobil is entitled to no further recovery under the
allegations of its Second Amended Complaint.
5. Coastal is entitled to no recovery under the allega-
tions of its First and Third Counterclaims.
It is, thereupon,
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that effective as of the date of
this judgment, with no liability for leasehold rentals and
expenses of Coastal during the period of litigation, Mobil
is entitled to and is hereby declared to have aone-half
interest in and to Leases 224-A, 224-8 and 248, but only in
the working interest areas described above, and Mobil does
I
not have any right to "other minerals" under Lake Okeechobee
as indicated in paragraph 23 of the Letter Agreement. Mobil
and Coastal are not entitled to any further relief under the
i
1
allegations in the Second Amended Complaint and the First
and Third Counterclaims.
~ DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Tallahassee, Florida,
this
~ o{D~ day of February, 1979.
4
~
Circuit Judge
Copies furnished to: ~
Hume F. Coleman STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF LEON
Robert J. Angerer ~ I HEREBY CERTIFY th he above nd f~~oing is a tNe
James R. Hubbard and correct copy of a ~
x
Daniel J. Wiser filed in my offic n '~aY . D, t
Wings Benton recorded in _ 6ao~; z
WITN m ha d and ofticyLL.al thi _
A. D. 19 ~ .
day of k Circuit frourt
r~~_E.^, e11~ R~ nch- P RTSFIE~D~ Cr
CQR..
~~38605 r ~
v '79 26 Phi 3.03
b
~~t.~n~c . :~~T~~~:~~, ao~~3U5 -.x,.2343