HomeMy WebLinkAbout0930 . . . , ~
`t~~li?~7
IN TI~ Q~tJ1T OaJRT QF Z4~
NII~".IEFNTH JL~IlCIAL QRQ)IT~
IN AND FO~t ST. LL~IS QOUJIR~
FTAItII~F?.
CTVIL AGTIQd
~ CASE NO. ?9 95 FR
IlJ RE: TE~ I~IRRTAC£ CF )
~
I~OCKSBERI' O. L1AYE~ ) •
)
Htlsbrc~Ild, ~
) ~zt~r. Jc~ar~mar ~
~rn ) ~
) DIS90LZ7rIQd l~?It~tIAGE ~
~O~:S G. T]AYE~ )
)
Wife. ) ~
) ,
I
This ca~e came an far trial the 2=d day of April, 1979,
and the Oourt havir~g qiven full ao~sideration to al1 the evic~enoe, finds
a¢id det~exmines: Zhis ~urt has j~si.sdictian of t1~e parties and subject
matt~er of this suit; that the relation of htLSba~d and wife nc~w exists
betw~een the parties; and that the marriage between the parties is irretrievably
braken and should be dissolved. It is therev~xn
~
OR~D AI~D AAT[7DG~ as follows: '
's
1. DIS9~IUPIQ~1 ~ I~RRIAC~. Rhe ~rriage bet~aeen IiOC.~SBERT
O. DAYE a~d DEIOI~S G. ~AYE be a~d the same is her~y dissolved, and the
parties and each of them are herd~y forever freed from the boncls of matrimony
heret~fore existing be~n th~n and from t~e obligatirns arising therefrcm. .
[
~
` 2. JURISDICTICN. Jurisdiction of this c~ause, a~d the ~*-t;es
~
~ herebo is retained far the ~nt~y of such furt~r orc~xs as may be pro~e,r.
~ DCNE AND ~E13~ at Fbrt Pierce, Florida, this 2 rd day of
~ April, 1979. '
~ ' C1 t Jtx3ge ;
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
z
~
~
~ ~ FI~EO ANG RECURDEO~.
- S7. tUC~E ~'~U':TY.:FIA:~
:-.rnr~ ~ ~;F~EO
5 . 43..~i29
~ '79 APR 3 AN I i: 3~ ;
s ~
~ ~
1 ~OIT~.-S
~ CLERK CtRCU~T COUR.?_
~
~
~
~
~
~
b
~ L r ~ ;~E gG7
~ - $:.'~r VtiV -
~ f
_ _ : ~a~
~:°a`~;... . .r,- .r.,r . . . . . . ~ - ~ ~Gh a ..~'.`_..=.a~~