HomeMy WebLinkAbout1566 + i ~ ~ . ~ a
IN THE CIR~T1Ii' ~ OF THE
NII~4TI'L:E2rI4i JUDICIAL CII~JIT
IN AND FOR ST. I~ICIE ~[JNi'Y,
FIQdtIpA
Case ?10. 78-265 CA
CLAtJDE T. JA(~~Ot~, ;
Plaintiff,
-vs- ORDER GRANTING ?~1'ION TO AP~I+ID
• 001Q'I,AII1i"
IDf~ItD JAMES I~H~DY, Md'4~JS,
IC~~Y & STI3~iT, P.A. , and
SHQ~Y M[flUAL INS[1!?AI~E ODZ~At7Y
OF SHF~I,BY, OHIO,
Defendants.
THIS CAixSE caane on to be heard on Plaintiff's Motion too Amend
the Ca~laint, and the Oourt being fully advised in the praises, it is
ORDERED AND AD?7000',ID that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Ooi~laint
be and the same is h~exeby granted, and the Amended Carplaint shall be deetaed filed
as of the date of this Order.
DOt~ m ORDERED in sat Fort Pierce, St. Lucie Oounty,
Florida, this day of , 1979.
i
IT COURT
Copies furnished to:
Mark J. Feldman, Esq.
Stephen G. Hayskar, I:sq.
The undersigned vounsel for tt~e Defendants
[ hereby stipulates and agrees to the entry
of the foregoing Order.
`t
i
d
G. Ilay'
Fi! EO RECOROEa
;nU~:TY. FLA..
_ -
'Z9 AFP, 6 AM l i: l 6~
g~
I
°s~~~ 306 Fa~~1565
s
. _ ~