HomeMy WebLinkAbout1917 ' ~ i~ 4~22i8
i~ i
.I 1
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
~ NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT;
IN AND FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY,
' STATE OF FLORIDA.
i CASE N0: 75-1141 CA
( DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT
i OF TRANSPORTATION, I
Plaintiff , ~ '
i~
vs.
i
ST . LUCIE GROVES INVESTMENTS
LTD., et al.,
~ ` Defendants . '
i
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION CASE N0: 77-479 CA
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION, `
i
Plaintiff ,
i~ V~• - i
1
! ST. LUCIE COUNTY, et al., -
Defendants . i '
ORDER
This cause having come on for hearing upon the Defendants',;
~ 1 LESLIE W. SCOTT and MARY F. SCOTT, t4otion to Tax Costs Including;
a Reasonable Attorney's Fee, and the Court having been presented'
~ with testimony, having heard argument of counsel and being ~
otherwise duly advised upon the premises, finds and determines
that this action was an integral part of a condemnation action
and was, in fact, consolidated with an existing condemnation
action; that the lands in this action were some of the same ~
lands involved in a prior condemnation action, D.O.T. vs. The
i
Wealden Co., et al., against these same Defendants; that a
determination of the respective rights of the parties among such; E
` parties was an essential and necessary function of the Court in
an eminent domain proceeding and that if the amount of compensa-~
tion to which LESLIE W. SCOTT and MARY F. SCOTT are entitled
is diminished by the amount of costs incurred by them in
establishing their interest in the property, they would not
gooK 307 ~~E 191' I
~ .
_
~LL - {
Ems` ~F~ - 3 F '*'`P
~ ~