HomeMy WebLinkAbout2297 I~
4~~;34`~
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
i~
iVINI•:TL:LNTI-1 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN
AND FOR ST. LUCIE, COUNTY, FLORID
CASE NO. 78-231-CA
MPL LEASING CORPORA'I'IC.N,
Plaintiff, )
~ )
vs. )
WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORS )
OF AMERICA, INC.. d/I~/a )
AUTOMATED 13USINLSS SYti'1'1•:MS; )
JAMES D. REVELLE anc) .I 1•:ltltY ) '
McCONN E T .I., )
)
Uefendanls___~
GRDER
This cause having cone on to be heard before me on May 4, 1979,
upon the Motion to Dismiss of JAI\lES D. REVELLE , and the Motion to
Quash Service of Process of .1 ERRY McCONNELL, and the court being
fully advised in the premises and having had the benefit of argument from
counsel, it is,
OKUERED r1Nl) AI),I ttt)(;t•:l) that the Motion to Dismiss be and the
same is hereby granted anal thc• Plaintiff shall have twenty days (20) in which
tc~ file an Affidavit of Good I•'ailh.
It affirmatively appearing; that the Plaintiff has filed a Cost Bond
in this action, that part of the i`lotion to Dismiss pertaining thereto is hereby
~ denied.
's
E
e
t
The remainder of the I~totion to Dismiss is hereby denied and the
4
i
t ~ Defendant, JAMES D. 12 F: V LI.E, shall have twenty days (20) in which to
t
1
amend his answer and affirmative defenses to include an allegation of the
3 lack of capacity of the Plaintiff herein to maintain an action in the courts of
` Florida, which allegation is i~rore• properly set forth as a Specially Pled
Matter pursuant to RC;P l . t Ltl.
IT IS FURTil1:R 01:1)1'Itl~:l) AND ADJUDGED that the Motion to
'orold H. Wtdewn ~ }
.rTORNEI~-AT-U?W Quash Service of Pro~~css is tECrc•t,~~ cler?iccl, and the Defendant JERRY
` j028 5. F~duW H.ry.
sr.lv~ita,fio.331S2 McCONl\ELI, shall have iwe•nEy clays (20) within which to file an answer in
s
.
F
i tlus action.
I)<~~iT•: Ai\,) c :'i)I•'+•'' .,~Nir~E ciran r~~•r~slin Forl Pit~rcG, St. Lucie
4
k` _ i
r- x _ _
_ _ _ - 8 Y
d t"
'1_t ~3v' _ :a_~