HomeMy WebLinkAbout0630 ~ ~ .
4~8965
' ~ IN ~ cI~tCUIT OOLIRT, NII~'IF.~IIIH
~ J[IDICIAL CIltCITIT, IN AI~ID F~t
; ST. I~ICIE ~I'Y, F'I.ORIDA.
~
` CASE N0. 79-118 CA
I
i ~
~ FRID QOYt~ (~~.T,
Plaintiff,
vs
IDKAR IEE N and VF~2A J.
P~."1IIt90I1, his wife; and WILLIAM L.
` PL'TIIt.90N and IDTIH PE'IF~SON,
his wife,
I'
il Defendants.
, ~
i; ~
il
~i .
i~l'ICE ~ V02UNTARY DIS~IISSAL WTIH PREJi]DICE
.
Cooes now the plaintiff, FRID QOYNE ~~I~T, by and th~o~u~i its
i;
i~ imdersigped attomeys, and wauld show imto this Caurt that this c:ause has been ~
~
,~a~dcably settled betiae~n the parties, and pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil
<<
Procedure, Rule 1.420 (a) (1), does hereby take a wlimtarj dismissal of the
~i
~~above-styled cause, with prejudice.
I~
I H1~tEBY CFRTIF'Y that a tnye and correct copy hereof was furnished by
u~il this . day of J~nie, 1979, to Vincent A. Lloyd, Esq. Lloyd & Brown,
I
;
~~P. 0. Box 4382, Fort Fierce, Florid.a 33450, Attarneys for the Defendants.
~
I
E
E
f
~ _
~
E i; ~
; Sullivar? ~ Cobb~ 9-
~ P. 0. Bax 3 ~
~ ' Vero Beach, Florida 32960
~ (305) 567-3258 ~
Attorneys for the Plaintiff ~
; _
~ ,
~ ~
~ f
_ ,
~ I
~ ~
~ ~
~
5
~ 448965( ;
~ ~
~ ?r9 J'::i 22 r!~ ~i ~7 ~
~
SULUVAN j. ` I
~ ANDCOBB f!i~u tihf MGl:l:r,;:D !
~ ~:.s 20TNfTREET 3S.LUCIE ~0±1N1Y.~t + ;
oos. oF~icc sox ~ ROG~~ POITRA5 ~
j! CLERK C1~LiStT CGI,~?;~'^" y
~ veaOBEwCl1,FlORIDA II '^,':r ` . ~ h ~
~
~ s~ ;i R=CO. ~
~
~ TELi?IIONE'i~71~71
~ AREACOOE ~ . i
; ~
:i v ~ ;
; ~ri~r.l~ 1 ~rr ~ ~