HomeMy WebLinkAbout2783 t%.,
,t, f
_ ll: ~ ~ _
_ TlI}.
i
1 1
~ f
~ Y
•
by appellees counsel would take care of the problem. Had the
s
trial court sustained the objection, we would have no difficulty ~ ~
in affirming the judgment. But in overruling the ob3ection the
trial court placed its imprimatur on counsel's argument ,which
could well have convinced the jury that such roads would be con-
structed when appellant had a~need for them.
_ We think the interests of justice require that appel-
lants be granted a new trial.. Accordingly, the judgment appealed.
from is reversed-and remanded for a new trial.
.REVERSED AND REMANDED.
~ - ~~T9 Atl6 2 t A~ ~ OT
E Pla~ ~
CMpNT COtXtT
YFAJf
~ 45~1~
E
E
li
4
CROSS and BERANEK, JJ., concur.
8~3~4 P~Fz7?~