HomeMy WebLinkAbout2601 . .
~ sc~
~
- - ~ ~ IN_CIRCUIT COURT, NINETEENTH _
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
' - CASE N0: 79-179 CA
PERSONALIZED CLEANING & MAINTENANCE
SERVICE, INC.,
Plaintiff,
-vs- ~ -
RICHARD DERVIN d/b/a ABRA CLEANING
• AND MAINTENENCE SERVICE, -
Def endant~.
FINAL JUDGMENT
. This matter, .having come before-the Court for trial with
the benefit of a jury upon the Complaint foi In3unetive Relief
filed herein by the Plaintiff, PERSONALIZED CLEANING & MAINTE-.
_ NANCE SERVICE, INC., and the jury having rendered a special
verdict in this action on August _6,,1979, as follows; -
SPECIAL VERDICT
We, the ,jury, find as follows:
~ -1. Did the Plaintiff, PERSONALIZED CLEANING & MAINTE-
NANCE SERVICE, INC., fail to ,pay to the Defendant, RICHARD
{~i DERVIN, sums referred to in Paragraph 17 of the Contract.
i YES X - NO
(If your answer to this question is yes, please
- ~ continue and answer question 2 below; if your
' answer is no, skip question 2 and answer questions
3 and 4)
2. If you answer to question ~ l was yes , did the
Defendant, RICHARD DERVIN, within a reasonable. time elect to
cease to perform under the contract.
~ - YES X ~ NO -
j -
3. Paragraph 2 of the Contract reads as follows:
"This contract is for a period of one (1) year, and is renewable
on an annual basis upon the mutual consent of the parties". Was
this contract renewed by the mutual consent of the parties? ~
YES ~ NO X
4. Did the Plaintiff, PERSONALIZED CLEANING b~ MAINTE-
NANCE SERVICE, INC., agree by its actions or conduct to allow _
E the Defendant, RICHARD DERVIN,. to-open a competing cleaning
business?
YES
! X _ NO
SO SAY WE ALL. `
Dated at Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, Florida, this 6th
day of August, A.D., 1y79.
/s/ Mrs. Furst ~
oreperson -
~ a~3~7 ~~~597