HomeMy WebLinkAbout0107 _
s4ioa ~ 6 s S~8 3 ~
4
IN TN6 CIRCUIT COURT OF TNB
NINETESNTN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND !OR ST. LUCIS CGUNTY,
PIARIDA.
CASE NO, 79-~1CA
AAY'S INN, INC., ORVILL6 R.
PARKS, and LOUISE T. PARKS,
his rife,
Plaintiffs,
SALVATORE KOLA, CAROLINA MOLA,
his rife, and OTTAVANIO NARIO
RATTI,
Defendants.
J U D O N E N T
THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard before the Court on
the Plaintiffs' Notion Por Deficiency JudglenL and Notion
for~Attorneya' Fesa in Connection With tM Oeficiency Judg-
ment. and tM Court noting that tM Defendant, OTTAYANIO
MARIO RATTI rag present without his attorney of record,
and that the Defendants SALYATORE KOLA, and CAROLINA KOLA.
his rife rere not present, nor was thsir attorney of record.
The Court further notes that tM Plaintiffs had personally
served, by the SMriff of St. Lucie County , SALVATORS KOLA,
CAROLINA MOLA, his rife, and OTTAYANIO.NARIO RATTI as to the
time and place of tM Haring for Deficiency Judgment.
The Court havins Hard the teat Laony of LOUISE T. PARKS
and RAYMOND PARKS as to tM items set out in the Plaintiffs'
Notion for Deficiency Judgment, and having received the teat-
,
imony that the items contalned in paragraphs 2, 3, and • have
not been paid. The Court accepts the value of tM restaurant
as =60,000.00 instead of the 550,000.00 in paragraph 1 of tM
Plaintiffs' Notion for Deficiency Jud~ent, in that the Plain-
tiffs' have a salt of the restaurant to Umberto DeLuca. There-
= fore the Court.radao+ed t!il~.~mount of the Deficiency Judg-
J
went from 81?9.D28:;X-to 839,G28.3M. The Court further having
heard teatisor~-LhtL a reasona0le attorneys' tee for the Def-
iciency Jud~etlt is 8750.00, it is therefore
R ,~3~-o P~ ~ ~3i,8 w~ dos
ray ' ~ ~ e'.