HomeMy WebLinkAbout1902 t
468~51~ ~ ~
Q-fi0/nr IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN
AND FOR ST, LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO. ?9-437-CA }
i
JOYCE BOND, )
Plaintiff, )
-vs- )
O R D E R
SHERMAN PETTEY and C. L. )
NORVELL, SHERIFF OF ST LUCIE f LED AN: j~~DEO
1~. lUC1E ' + FLA.
COUNTY FLORIDA ) ~oc~ = ~ ' 5
RECCQ" iii".r~
Defendants. ) ~~i13 ~ s 16
THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard upon the
Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time, Motion to Dismiss,
and Motion to Strike, and the Plaintiff's Motion for Default,
this 26th day of November, 1979,-and this Court having considered
the arguments of counsel, and it appearing to the Court that the
Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time was filed prior to the
time that the time for filing of responsive pleadings to the
Plaintiff's complaint had elapsed, and this Court having further
considered the arguments of counsel, it is therefore,
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Plaintiff's Motion for Default be and the
i
I. same is hereby denied.
2. The Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be and the same
is hereby denied.
~ 3. The Defendants' Motion to Strike is denied, subject
E
however to Defendants' counsel providing this Court with a brief
as to the liability to the Defendant C. L. NORVELL for the acts
of the Defendant SHERMAN PETTEY, pursuant to the doctrine of
respondeat superior.
4. The Defendants shall have 20 days within which to
file their res onsive leadinQs, file any briefs as they may so
P P
desire as to the liability of the Defendant C. L. NORVELL. The
Plaintiff shall have 20 days thereafter to reply to said brief,
and the Defendants shall have 10 days thereafter within which
3
to reply to the Plaintiff's brief.
s
DONE AND ORDERE in ChambP,rs, at/fort Pierce, St. Lucie
( " 1979.
County, Florida, this day of M~.- ,
C
l
~
~ Copies furnished: IT E .
1 _T~hn w ('n~tiaan F.sn _ noM~ .