HomeMy WebLinkAbout2917 ~
A 69136
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND
FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY.
CASE N0. 78-18-CA
KATHERINE JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
K-MART CORPORATION,
a~Michigan corporation,
Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE coming on in due course for trial and a jury of six (6) lawful
jurors having been empanelled, and said jury having been sworn to well and truly
try the issues in this cause and a true verdict render according to the law and
the evidence, and the jury having heard the evidence introduced, charges of the
Court, argument of counsel for the respective parties, and having retuned to
consider their verdict, did return to open Court on the 28th day of November,
1979, and rendered the following verdict:
"WE, the Jury, return the following verdict:
1. Was there negligence on the part of the Defendant, K-Mart
Corporation, which was a legal cause of damage to Plaintiff?
Yes X No
f
j (If your answer to question number 1 is "no", your verdict is for Defendant
and you should not proceed further execpt to date and sign this verdict form and
return it to the Courtroom. If your answer to question number 1 is "yes",
please answer question number 2.)
2. Was there negligence on the part of the Plaintiff, Katherine Johnson,
which was a legal cause of this damage?
Yes No X
0
F4
R
(If your answer to question number 2 is "yes", please answer question
number 3.
If your answer to question number 2 is "no", skip question member 3 and
answer question number 4.)
G
3. State the percentage of a y negligence which was a legal cause of
damage to Plaintiff, Katherin Joh on, that you charge to:
Defendant, K-*tart poration - X
s Plaintiff, Katherine Johnson - y
Total must be - 100 X
0
Please answer question number 4.
~ Bti~K 3~1 PAGE ~ •
i3