HomeMy WebLinkAbout0351 - - -
-
-...sar.-..:..a..'~,_.-..~--.~..._,aa..-~a~ijaq -~-mss -u-~-..c...`::-~~.w~r •.7a. ~:-.....~~i.:.:....i». _..-..:.s_.s..- _..~s~._a.s., - - -
~i~ • . -
13. All Departa?eat of Transposta- Relevancy and
Lion conststiotion platys and materiality.
apeci#icatioas, contract doau-
manta, daily ius~ctioa reports,
permit "doauatentaticn,~ sta. , ~ .
pertaining to State ~co~eot No.
94050-3509,~in Ft. Puce,
Florida.
14. All Department of Transports- Relevancy and
- tfon documentation pertaining materiality.
to .the nature and extent of
- A~s~wsa ratAl4 rte! 1~11d: QAl~t Af -
--tea ~ - =c -
repairs related to the"fish- •
walk at issue in this
litigation.
15. .Deposition of J. D. Henderson Relevancy and
with all exhibits. materiality.
16. Second A~aended Complaint Relevancy and
[First Amended Complaint- materiality.
as aanended. Decemb_
er 27, 1979]
including- Pera~3.t and Joint
PYOjeat Agreement Construction
Modification.
17. All Department of Transports- Relevancy and
tion specifications pertinent materiality..
to the instant, project. .
18. Any and all exhibits included Relevancy and
in Defendants' Pre-Trial materiality.
Statement.
. OBJECTIONS
RESERVED
NO. DEFENDANTS (By Plaintiff
1. - Contract Relevancy and
materiality.
2. Construction plans for Relevancy and
the bridge. materiality.. -
3. Construction plena for the Relevancy and
waterpine prepared by Black, materiality.
Craw a Eidsness.
4.. Aerial photograph used by Relevancy and
.engineers in preparing plans materiality.
for waterline..
5. Permit for construction- Relevancy and
issued by Department of materiality.
Transportation.
6. 7.etters and written correct- Relevancy and
pondence between Ft. Pierce materiality.
Utilities Authority, engin-
eering firm and Department.
of Transportation.
7. Minutes of pre-construction Relevancy and
conference. materiality.
- 3 -