HomeMy WebLinkAbout0361 6
IN THS CIRCUIT COURT OF THB
NIN8T88NTH .TODICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR ST. LUCIS COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
- CASE- NO. 79-326 CA
JBRRY A. SHBCATNAN, d/b/a
ii~liiiMWiAaaa ~awv.~..~.v.. ..~.w.vi, -
Plaintiff,
vs.
ROBERT O. ZSITZ,
- Defendant.
ORDER
THIS CAUSE coming on for hearing upon the Plaintiff's objection
to defendant's-third set of interrogatories, and upon argument of
counsel, and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises,
it is '
ORDERED ~iND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's objection to the Defendant's
third set of interrogatories is granted except that the Plaintiff
must furnish to the Defendant the following information:
1. The total number of such letters sent;-
. 2. The names of persons to whom the letter was sent .
limited to those names set out in the Defendant's list of clients
furnished to the Plaintiff and further limited to the names of
the Plaintiff's customers who have complained to the Plaintiff of
direct contact made with them by the Defendant, ROBERT O. ZEITZ.
The Plaintiff in not required to disclose to the Defendant any of
the names of the Plaintiff's customers who are not already known to
the Defendant.
DONE AND ORDER~EiD in Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, Florida,
this day of / A.D., 1980.
J qe
Copies furnished to: r98Q Fig -S fiC1 ~ ~J.~
Roger N. Messer, Esq. "
fR.U ENO FECUr?i~tU
ST. LUCIE COON TY. Ft A.
James T. Walker, Esq. ROGER Pa tRas
C!f Rtt CIRCUIT CGL//RT _
' RECG:'Q 1'rRlFli•;t_. ~Q_~~._
aoa~~ r~
Ll? O~IIC>rS OT HIC81>TD A SIfEED, J>i., P. 700 ~?IHOIIIL ~YENUi. SU1TE 101-SUIT HAIR Hla(i.. !t. PIL>>CS, 11AHtDr 30160 (30b) X86-H300