HomeMy WebLinkAbout1911 ,
r
.s~r~ .arc.: ~ - s._ .,:w.s,...~,„...,~,s-:i..._ - ~,+r~..~tu.-_..o...:_.._.~.:.y_:.'
•
4~60~3
2 _
IN THS CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 19TH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN Ai+1D FOR ~
ST. LUCI$ COtD~Y, FLORIDA.
CASB NO. 79.604-C11
ADDIS MAS CAYSON,
Plaintiff,
-vs-
FURST C~ANY OF FORT PIERCE,
a corporation; WILLIAM C. FURST, 4~Q~
an individual; JQAN H. FURST,
an individual; WILLIAM C. FURST,
JR., an individual; UARLA-ANN
FURST, an individual; and
TorQ~nt G. LSDFORD, an individual, ~p fEB 13 P!t 12 4
Defendants. R
~
ORDER vEa~~o~
After due notice by or to all parties effected, on
January 29, 1980, a Hearing was held before the Court with
respect to the Motion to Diamiss and Motion to Strike filed by
the Defendants, FURST COMPANY OF FORT PIERCE, a corporation; E
WILLIAM C. FURST, an individual; JOAN H. FURST, an individual;
WILLIAM C. FURST, JR., an individual; and DARLA ANN FURST, an
! individual, and upon consideration it is;
! ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
R~
1) Inasmuch as the allegations contained in and xelief ~
1 sought in~Count I of the Coatpl$int relate only to the Defendant,
TOMMY G. LEDFORD, the other named Defendants need not respond ~
! to Count I. ~
i I
j 2) The Court reserves ruling on the sufficiency of ;
l
I• Count IV with respect to the allegations of entitlement to
punitive damages; The Court will rule on this Motion to Dismiss
t~
and Strike at the time of the Pre-Trial Hearing,
3) The Motion to Strike attorney's fees contained in '
Count III and the Motion to Strike the claim for mental anguish
1~ and emotional distress contained in Covnt IV is granted, ;
DONE AND ORDERED in Ch era at Fort Pie ce, St. Lucie ~
i
County, Florida, this day of A. D,,
1980. !
M' ~
Copies furnished to:
Vincent A. Lloyd, Esquire
~ Michael P, Lesniak, Esquire ~
~3~5 ~i905