HomeMy WebLinkAbout2563 - ,
x _ m _
- -=:~..._si.~vi=:- - wficaG2+.=.'+ tS3:~-_?S "i' .+~....a.r-~:.i ~--_.._.r..~` ..ate
`:s':.saCi:~:.'~ia~L.~.-.>a -
IN Tom! CxRC~1IT COORT Off' THE I~lIt~T$BNTt~
- Jt1DICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST ht~Ia -
. COt1NTY r ~'IARtDI/:
11YL1~NE SI+IGH •
CASE N.O. 76-1175 CA - -
Pla~intiff,
vs.
EM1yA. R. SLIGH. CRU1rIDLSY,
Defendant. -
ORDER DENYING 140TION~TO DISSMISS
THIS CAUSE having come on to be-heard upon the
Defendant's.Motton to Dismiss-For Failure to Prosecute on
April 24, 1979, and the Court having benefit of briefs from
counsel and being otherwise fully advised, in the premises, it
it therefore
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant's Motion -
to Dismiss For Failure to Prosecute in hereby denied and the
Defendant shall have Twenty (20) Days to further. plead.
DOiJB AND ORDERED at Fort Pierce, Florida, this 15th
day of February, 1980.
l
C .ti
_L
p , C R I E
E
-
t -
Copies furnished to: ~
{
C. R. McDonald, Jr. , Esq. ~ FEg ~g A~{ ~ 55
Joseph M. aright, Esq.
(of Cunningham ~ Cunningham) - ~~~o Y flA.
~ RE130M YERIflEO__~
.4'75439
b
~~7