HomeMy WebLinkAbout1669 ~
4814'72
i
TN 'hiB CI~iLUIT 00«iT OP' 'A~ NII~
JUDICIAL CIALTJIT, IN AND FO~t ST. I1)CIE
OOI~TlY, FIARIDA.
(~IIIrIINAL DIVISI~I
't
CASE NO. 80-192-CA
WILLIAM A. HI'tT,
Petitioner,
Vs. ORDIIt STAYING TRIAL
HC~IORAflLE E. P. DeFRffiT,
Respar~dent.
This matter haviryg Dame before this Oourt upon Petition for
Writ of Prohibition suggesting this Oourt issue Idle to Show Cause to ?
Honorable E. P. DeFriest t~fiy Rule Nisi Absolute should not be issued pro-
.
hibiting the Oovnty Overt of St. Lucie Qauity, Flarida, Exam e~oercising
jurisdiction in the certain suit, State of I~'larida vs. Wi.lliaa A. Hitt,
Case No. 79-21021TT, therefare,
IT IS F~~BY ID AND ADJi7DGID that the said Petition has
set forth a prima facie case, and that trial in State of Florida vs. W;llia~n
A. Hitt, Case No. 79-21021TT is F~:l2FSY STAYBD until the disposition of the
Iaile to Shaw Cause.
DO[~ AND 0, ~ixi Martin Oounty, Stuart, Flarida, this
day of March, 1980.
ki
E
4Si4'~
. ~ ~ gas
~ hE~M~A
1~~
~~~{t0
a
gee ~ f~E~~-
_m~