HomeMy WebLinkAbout0177 ' •
y i
r
~~23'75
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR ST, LUCIE COUNTY,
FLORIDA
I
CASE NO. 80-109-CA ~
i
MICHAEL S. McCARTY and
LYNN McCARTY, his wife,.
t
Plaintiffs,
t
vs.
WALKER CHEMICAL AND EXTER- i
MINATING COMPANY, INC., a
Florida corporation,
Defendant. -
r
ORDER ~ ~
THIS CAUSE having come before the undersigned on
April 1, 1980, upon Defendant's Motion for Protective Order,
Defendant's Amended Motion to Dismiss, Defendant's Motion
to Strike, Defendant's Motion for More Definite Statement,
and Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, it is accordingly
ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. With consent of the Defendant, Defendant's Motion
I for Protective Order is found to be moot and is therefore
4
li denied;
2. As to Defendant's Amended Motion to Dismiss,
judgment is reserved and Defendant shall have twenty days
from entry of this Order within which to serve a memorandum
of law showing why the complaint should be dismissed in
one or more of its counts. The Plaintiff shall have twenty
days thereafter within which to serve a~memorandum of law
in response;
3. Defendant's Motion to Strike is granted and
Plaintiff shall have leave to amend;
4. Defendant's Motion for More Definite Statement
is granted;
~ 5. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel answers to interrog-
atories, and Motion to Compel Production of Discovery Material
is found to be premature and is therefore denied, subject
to Plaintiff's right to reassert any and all remedies which
G[IOKV~.i'~7 PARE 'l
~