HomeMy WebLinkAbout0845 ! ~
_ ` i
4sas~~
IN THIS CIRQIIT OOURT OF THE 19Z4i
JimICIAL CIF~tJIT, IN AND FOR SAII~TP
T1lCIS O(X)Ni'Y, F'I,i0i2IpA
CASE NO. 80 472 FR
IN THE I~1TiER OF THE ADC~'PION OF:
MARK ANZ1iQ8Y CI~RK, .
I
a gild.
FINAL JUDGMENT OF ADOPTION
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard before me this
day on Motion of the Petitioners for Final Judgment of Adoption,
and appearing to the Court that the State of Florida Department
of Health and Rehabilitative Services has filed its report, that
one of the Petitioners is married to one of the natural
parents of the child sought to be adopted, and accordingly,
no report was required by statute, and this Court determining
that no report is necessary or recommended, and the Court
having considered the consents executed by Gordon Ellis Clark i
and Marsha Jean Clark, and being otherwise fully advised in the
premises, finds:
1. That the Petitioners, EDMUND EUGENE STAFFORD,
and SALLY RAE STAFFORD, his wife, are fit and proper persons
to adopt the child named in the Petition, and that the best
i
interest of the said child will be promoted by such adoption.
2. That the said child is suitable for adoption
by the said Petitioners.
3. That the Petitioner, SALLY .RAE STAFFORD, is the
natural mother of the child, and is presently married to the
Petitioner, EDMUND EUGENE STAFFORD.
It is, therefore, upon consideration
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED:
(a) That the permanent custody of the child known
as MARK ANTHONY CLARK, in these proceedings, be and the same is
B~ tic7lJ PACE
6RENNAN, McALtLEY, HAYSKAR 6 McALILEY, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, 519 SOUTH INDIAN RIVER DR., FORT PIERCE, FLA, 33450
a
N