HomeMy WebLinkAbout0303 1;
• `3
2. Although the Court finds that some of the other Motions
to Strike certain paragraphs of Florida Farm Bureau's Answer
and Affirmative Defenses may be well taken, the remaining
Motions to Strike are denied at this time and will be recon-
sidered at pre-trial conference.
3. The Court withholds ruling with. regard to the Motion to
Dismiss the Cross-Claim for Declaratory Relief at this time so
that Plaintiff and Defendant may present memorandum on this
y;_.
point and thereafter call it up for hearing.
4. Plaintiff's counsel advised the Court as he had previously
advised defense counsel that he may agree with counsel for the
individual Defendants to have judgment entered against them for
a certain amount leaving the only remaining issues to be litigated,
those of coverage on the part of Florida Farm Bureau and/or bad
faith actions on the part of FLORIDA FARM BUREAU CASUALTY
INSURANCE.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at St. Lucie County, Florida, -
Q
this O ¢ day of 1980.
CIR UI JODGE
1~
Copies furnished: ~1
Christian D. Searcy, Esq.
P. O. Drawer 3626 4~1~
West Palm Beach, FL 33402
Attorney for Plaintif f -
Stephen G. Hayskar, Esq.
P. O. Box 3779 ~:.EO eft,. N~cCn:: o
Ft. Pierce, FL 33450 S1.lUClFCOt;YTY.FI~i:
ROGER POITRAS
Attorney for Def. FLORIDA FARM BUREAU CLERISCIRCt'tTCC;lRT~
Raymond F. Ford, Esq.
~ P. O. Box 3307 -
Ft. Pierce, FL 33450
Attorney for De_f. MACIASES and SERENA
e~ 331 PACE 303