HomeMy WebLinkAbout1483 1
•
4
f
urould be inactive. Further, plaintiff and defendant had a ~ i~
full understanding that plaintiff would be in the employment of l
the defendant and defendant waa well aware of plaintiff's prior ~
I
employment. To deny plaintiff to sue defendant for whatever -
right that could inure to his benefit against this defendant,
when defendant had full knowledge of plaintiff's prior employ-
ment, would be unconscionable. Further, the Court determines -
that this action does not involve a broker's transaction as set -
forth in @475.42 (d) of the Florida Meal Estate License Lang.
For the reasons stated, said mdtion of defendant is denied.
ACCORDINGLY, defendant is entitled to judgment against
plaintiff in the amount of $2,162.50, for which let execution
f
issue. - '
Costs of this action are to be borne equally between
the parties.
DONE AND ORDERED, in Chambers, at Vero Beach, Florida,
this -day of May, 1980.
s
CIRCUIT JUDGE •
Copies furnished: -
Ronald Paul Whitley, Saquire _
Wesley R. Sarvin, Esquire
STATE OF FLORIDA .4
Martin County ~ • '
. !hereby certify that tlx:' r'-
is a and correct cop - ~ - .
y ~
1980 NAY I6 A~ ~I• ~ - t ~ ~~.'Y.~A~-~'1_ ~i~:;-: ;
ElLEO ANC PECpp~~t d of ' . ~
Si.IUCiE CBUNTY.FLA.
ROGERPOITRAS in this of$;ce. ,it
q.ERKC1ilCUI1C0UR~ Witness m ha ~f,3~;. `.~~rt cr .
.~'Q,f s ~ y. ~
office t~iis - _ i
-L d,,r aF-_
Li~UISE V. ISAAC
~$6~ ey - -
1