HomeMy WebLinkAbout1745 il
i
rather than rehabilitative subject to the ever present
authority to modify it if her proposed secretarial training
is completed and her income substantially increases, all in
accordance with the precepts~of Wilson v. Wilson, 279 So.2d
893 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).
The other point on appeal with merit concerns the
trial Judge's division of both personal property and real
estate in Florida and Texas. Formerly,. under the law laid!
down by the Supreme Court as we perceived it, much of this
division of property between the spouses might have constituted
reversible error. However, the Supreme Court, in a landmark
decision appears to have approved the trial Judge's course of
conduct in this case. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, So.2d
(Fla. Case No. 54124, Opinion filed March 27, 1980). '
Accordingly, the Final Judgment is approved in all
respects with~the exception that the award of rehabilitative
alimony is herewith reversed .and set aside in favor of a
permanent periodic aF:ard in the sane sum. ~
~I REVERSED AND P.EMADTDED FOR THE ENTRY OF A JUDGt1ENT
IN ACCORDANCE HFREFIITH .
~ 198a MA't 19 PK 12~ 20
' fs~fu e~r'~co~~:o
St <UCIE C T Y. f A.
ARK CHtCWTjC~Ilt
~'EltlfiE!?
4as9s1
DOWNEY and MOORE, JJ., concur.
a~~3~ p,~~.744
-2-