HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986 ~ pay
'
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE i
19TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN
AND FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE N0. 75-565 CA
JOHN B. SULLIVAN, M.D.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JOHN Y. SKEENS, et al., ORDER
Defendants. ,
THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard before ,
me on the Motions for Summary Judgment of JOHN Y.-SKEENS,
BECKHAM ~ McALILEY, ROBERT J. BECRHAM, THOMAS W.
McALILEY, BECKHAM & McALILEY, P.A. and RENTZ, McCLELLAN
& HAGGARD, L. .EDWARD McCLELLAN, and Law Offices RENTZ,
t
McCLELLAN & HAGGARD, P.A.; and upon the Motion to Strike
and Motion for Continuance by the Plaintiff SULLIVAN,
and the Court having heard argument and being advised in
the premises, it is now, therefore _
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff's
Motion to Strike the Motions for Summary Judgment of the
j Defendants, SIZEENS, BECI~HAM & McALILEY, ROBERT J. BECKHAM,
I
~ THOMAS W. McALILEY, and BECRHAM & McALILEY, P.A. be, and
the same is hereby granted on the grounds that those
Motions for Summary Judgment failed to comply with Rule 1.510(c)
i
Florida Rules of Civil Procedure; and it is
. FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Motion for
Su~nary Judgment of the Defendants, RENTZ, McCLELLAN &
~ HAGGARD, L'. EDWARD McCLELLAN, and Law Offices RENTZ,
McCLELLAN & HAGGARD, P.A., be and the same is hereby
continued, based on the request of attorneys for these
Defendants; and it is
'r
FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff.'s
Motion for Continuance of the hearing on all Motions for _
l t
€ Summary Judgment be, and the same is hereby granted in
t
4
BG~i7~7~ PdGf