HomeMy WebLinkAbout2170 i
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
IN AND FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
CASE NO. 79-1371 FR
i
PEGGY JANE WINKLES,
t
Petitioner,
-vs-
REESE SANFORD McHAM,
Respondent.
O R D E R
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the 2nd day of June,
1980, upon the objection to interrogatories and Motion For Pro-
tective Order filed by the Petitioner and the Court having heard
counsel for the Petitioner and Respondent enter into a Stipulation
in open Court on the record, and said Stipulation being that the
attorney for the Petitioner stated that the Petitioner did not ~
i
have any witnesses except for those enumerated in the Petitioner's t
Answers to the Interrogatories previously propounded by the Respon-
f
dent to the Petitioner, that the Petitioner at this time does not
i
have any expert witnesses, and that if the Petitioner does subse-
t
~ quently learn of and decide to call either additional lay witnesses
or expert witnesses at the trial of this cause, that the Petitioner
will immediately wive notice of the names and addresses of said
lay and expert witnesses to the attorney for the Respondent so that
the Respondent will have the opportunity to take the depositions of
any of said witnesses prior to the time of trial; that based upon
;
_ the foregoing Stipulation by the Petitioner, the attorney for the
7 Respondent did request to the Court to allow the Respondent to with-
g
x draw the Interrogatories which were the subject of_ the objection
and Motion For Protective Order. And the Court being otherwise
fully advised in the premises, it is thereupon
-1- rc~216~ '
- - ~s