HomeMy WebLinkAbout0244 1.
this issue because no matter what his status, there is no indi-
cation that any negligence of these defendants was the proximate
cause of plaintiff's injuries. A similar situation was presented
in Pie v. Cruise Boat Co., Inc., 380 So.2d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA
1980), where the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a
summary 3udgment based on an absence of proximate-cause where
the plaintiff entered a highway from an' obstructed shoulder
area. We believe this case is governed by the same principle
as applied in the Pope decis~an and the stmimary judgment is
therefore affirmed.
AFFIRMED. .
I
I
19~ .lllri 16 A!I $ 56
I
F EO END ~EC~tp~Q
' S~LIlC{E COUN~Y.F``A
~tO6Elt POITRAS
CLERK CIRCtKT
REC~R~ YERIFIFO.
• OJ
4
i
ANSTEAD, J., and SIMONS, STUART M., Associate Judge, concur.
i
-3- i
so~3~3 244
.