Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1597 ~ o' ~~'~6 S'~R.TE OF MICHI~'~A'i i III 'FHC. CIRC~I'r' CElG'RT FOR THE COUNTY OF 21AC0~lB DOPY SHEI::~'~, Plaintiff, ' .ys_ Case t]o. 80-1103-IY.3 ~:Ae4LD C_ Sf1~~, De`e~aist ~®OR~E J_ FEaEEF~A?LI ~P1368:;_~ Attorney for Plaintiff f r7DD~"~*'c.:~]T' OF DIVORCE ~?t a .session of laic} Court, held in the ~R ~ ~ i 68a©oa~b tbunty Coe~Tt Building, City of x mount Ciemens, County of Hacomb, State of Flicbic~n, ou , 1980. t ~ P?tE.SE~~'": ~K~.RRB_T.E ROBERT J. CIiRZALJOWSKI a : Circuit Court Judge . ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ '8bis cause ~ravring core on to be heard ut~on the ~ r ~ t v ~ ~ Complaint filed ~eereEn, taken as confessed by the Defendant, ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ = and tRne proofs baying been taken in open Court, frori c,~hich it ~ _ ~ ~ satisfactorily appears to this Court that the naterial facts i : e ~ alleare3 ia~ t.~e C~laint are true, and that there has been a Y ~ ° brea~do~rn in ts'~e srarriage Telaiionshin to the extent that the ~ ~ i f ~ objects of r~atra*-~ony ha~re been destroyed and there renains no ~r reasonable liD~elifiood that the marriage relationship can be preser~?ed _ - O~n lKotioat of FREEtiAN, HIKE*]ZIE, I'lA~THEt]S, SCHERER & S:'EPE~, P_C_, R~ttorneys for Plaintiff, DOROTHY E. SHER*iAN, i DIVORCE IY YS ~.Ei1~ ORDERED RID ADJi1DrED, and this Court by ~irtaae of the a~stt®ority therein rested, and in pursuance of ~ the statr~es isn such cases Wade and provided, DOiH ORDER AND ADJI~ar; that tr°~e narriage between the Plaintiff, INTRO^HY F.. SH£~"'~D, aatai the ®efendant, I'.J~IAT n C. SYERitnN, be, and the sane 3s hpreb~~ d'.ssole+ea~ acc~ar3ingly, and the parties are, and each o'f t~ is, free €r«~rt the obligations tilereo`. ~~~37 P~E158~::