HomeMy WebLinkAbout1517 ~
4
i
t
~w.r.~- ~.e~.wrw.~,. ev
t
t
i
KR. ~I.l1DW: It's jnst a factual
T8E 001lRT:'All right. I'n going to tell you abet
the facts are. First, I an going to make a determination of
the facts sad they ae'l1 try to apply thee` to the lea.
?Dt. BDLT~OH: All right.
TBE ~70gkT: I a going to find from the evidence
• yell, first, back up a little bit. The nee evidence code
's
prevails because this snit Tires filed after January 1st,
.1979. I just looked bare to see. In case ae get in an argu-
'eat, it vas filed-July 20, 1979. Having got that off my
shoulders, n+ar let's 'owe to the nest point. - _ _
Imo. BOLT~i: I von't argue with you on that, Judge,
bat go ahead.
ZHE OOUYt: the nest point 18~i'm going to find
fio, the evidence that Dollar, through its eaployee Quick,
~mev that the vehicle ass going to be need to tow another
t
vehicle, for vbatever weight yon gentleoen want to give that
der~*~*L*ion of the evidence.
liov, having aade that determination, trying to fit it
to the legal situation. First, it's obvious that a contract i
e~dsted, using those facts, between Dollar and Goodman. It -
also is obviona~that Goodman signed a contract on those
s
facts, ne ~
8s~~g his previous agreement with Quick. Because
I
in effect Quick bad said "We'll furnish you a car" and then ~
Goodvaa goes up there and signs this paper that has a provision
is it that the contract is no good if you toW a vehicle.
Yell, let me back up a little bit. I-gues• the contract
~ C
vas perfectly good at that point, until the time he towed
f
a vehicle. Because you know the contract could be in good
I ~
-2- son 338 ~1~1.~~ - ~ - ~