HomeMy WebLinkAbout0232 - - ~ r
• ` ~
- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
CASE N0. 56,373
PARCEL N0. 1
~
• RICHARD S DENIMARK, ~ OCT 18 1979 ' ,
et al. , -
Petitioners , - CLIEttK su~RS~s
v' MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS'-FEE~
THE STATE OF,FLORIDA DEPART- ~ -
MENT OF TRANSPORTATION, r
z
Respondent.
• The petitioners-landowners move~~the Court for an
-
award on attorneys' fees pursuant to F.S. 731.131(2). Peti- j
tioners-landowners respectfully request and suggest that, in 6
-
accordance with prevailing practice. such fee should be
determined by the trial court upon remand. Determination of
the fee by the trial-court seems particulatrly appropriate
since fees for services in the Fourth District Court of Appeal
will also need to be assessed if petitioners-landowners obtain
a reversal in this Court of the order denying fees below.
~ - In the- alternative, if the Court determines- that
f
fees shall be assessed in this Court, petitioners-landowners
respectfully request entry of an order allowing them a~reason-
.able tame within which to present their proofs to this Court ~
as to the reasonable value of the appellate services rendered -
by their counsel. J
Respectfully submitted,
KELLY, BLACK, BLACK, WRIGHT
~ EARLE,-P.A.
1400 Alfred I. duPont Building•
Jr~a~1 Miami , Florida 33131
and
BROWN, PAXTON & WILLIAMS
I P. 0. Box 1418
1980 SEP 22 AN i~ 03 Fort Pierce, Florida 33450
and
FiLEO RNC FECO~GfO
~ sT.wc~r co TY.f A. DANIELS AND HICKS
aE°w:tsc ctRC~tc A~t 1414 duPont Building
- Rrce~a~~Far:c^. _ _l _ - 169 East Flagler Street
Miami Florida 33131
(305) 374-8171
Attorneys for Petitioners
8OO1(e)e,7e7 PAGE BY CQ J
r. ~ ens AND NIGK/. ATTORN[Y/ AT LAW. 1414 DYrONT /UILDINO. MIAMI. /LORIDA!!1!1 - (30!) 374•at7t
- Z~y,--,.+,K,a..