HomeMy WebLinkAbout0965 ~
I
i
z
2.) That counsel for the parties have resolved the claim
set forth in 76-1229-CA and 77-100-CA with the exception of those matters
consolidated with 77-325-CA as per subparagraph 1) above.
3.) That the remaining issues to be tried may require the
testimony of Brad Culverhouse, Esq. of Ft. Pierce, Florida; a prior ~
attorney for Plaintiff herein.
4.) That said Brad Culverhouse, Esq., has heretofore declined
to testify based upon attorney client privilege as between himself and
Plaintiff.
5.) That the parties, with the approval of the Court, have
agreed to the submission of written interrogatories by Defendants to
Mr. Culverhouse to enable definition of positions with respect to
such privilege.
6.) That Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is currently pending.
7.) That the parties appeared before the Court on July 9, 1980
and agreed to the above with the approval of the Court. _
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that this Court continue the non-jury
trial hereof until such time as the case is at issue and either of the
parties re-notices the matter for trial.
i
k CURTIS, STOKES., PHILPOT, BELLY JONES, FOSTER & MOSS
& LILLY, P.A.
B By:
R. Ke t Lill Esq. Theodore W. Herzog, Esq.
Post Office Drawer A P. O. Box 3406
Lakeland, Florida 33802 Vero Beach, 60
Attorneys for Defendant Attorneys iff
ORDER -
t '
~ This cause came on for hearing on July 9, 1980 upon
e
motion by the parties for continuance end the Court having been fully
advised in the premises, it is
i
4 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
The parties' Motion for Continuance is granted and the
consolidated issues will be tried on a non-jury basis at such time as the ~
i
P~ 965
~