HomeMy WebLinkAbout1851
~,.~_.~._ _._.
The appearances at said timea and place Mere ae follows:
~ . , ~. .
FOR R+t18TRT A. ~ JONF.S. FOSTER & MOSS, ESQS.
EFPBRSON: P. O. Bo~c 3406 ~ '
Vero Beach. FL 32960
• BY: GEORGE H. MOSS~ ESQ. -
FOR DEFENDANTS ~ RAYMOND E. FORD, ESQ.
HAZEN KREIS and P. O, Box 3307
RAYMOND LOVEDAY, JR. Ft. Pierce, FI. 33450
FOR THE ~1. R. SCOTT. ESQ,
RECEIVER: P. O. Aox 2057
Stuart, FL 33494
At the conclusion of the hearing. the Court annovnced its
ruling as follaws:
THE COIJRT: Okay. Finished?
MR. MOSS: Yes. sir.
MR. FORD: Yes. sir.
THE COURT: First. of course ve got to remember I haven't
heard a11 of the evidence. eo I really don't kno~ what the ultimate
outcome would be; that creates a big problem. Also. since there ia
no po8sibility of a rescission arrangement. ~uet hitting it
lightlp fram the evidence, I get the impressian that this grown
man, Mr. Epper$on. who had legal coumsel. had made a deal and he
didn't quite go through with the deal; no~ he saqs there'e some
reasona, and he named four of them. whq he didn't ~anC to go
through wfth the deal, Which theoretically would be a partial
failure of consideration.
Now~ being that thia is a court of equity. I am not
really overly enthused abaut that approach [o-the problem, just
as I am not overly enthused about the fact that if you rely on
the strict wording of-the option agreement the apparent parking
-2-
a~x345 P~~~1849
i
i~
l;
.~
, . ..
I - - - - ~ ~-- ~_.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- - - -~~~_. - _~ - - _ _~ =----- _-- -- -_ . _ -- _~