HomeMy WebLinkAbout0665S~ 2'793
IN THE~CIRCUIT COUFT OF THE .
NINETEENTH JITDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY.
FLORIDA.
CASE N0. SO-576-CA
JOSEPH LACH and MARY ANN LACH,
his wife, _
Plaintiffs.
vs.
TIIO & TNREE CO?~ANY , a Florida
corporation, et al,
Defen dants.
AMENDED SUl`4•'IARY JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE
This cause having come on to be heard on the following
motions: (1) Plaintiffs' Motion to Set Foreclosure Sale Date,
to Post Bond or Collateral for Counterclaim, to Set Attorneys'
Fees and Court Costs, and to Determi.ne Priorities as to Lien
and Judgment Holders; (2) Motion of Defendant ~ao and Th ree
Company for Relief from Judgment Under R. 1. 540(b) , and the parties
being repres~nted by counsel before the Court, and the Court having
noted the stipulations made by counsel in open Court, and further
the Court having heard and considered testimony as to attorneys
fees an d argument of counsel on pending motions, and the Court
being fully advised in the premises, it is, upon consideration,
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
That the Su~nary Judgment of Foreclosure entered in this
cause on December 24, 1980, by this Court is amended to read as
follows :
1. ihat due and legal service of process has been had upon
the Defendants TWO & THREE COI-~ANY; [,?ALK~R PRODUCE, INC. ; V& F
TRADING, INC. ; RANDY MILLEP., EXECllTIVE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF
REVENUE , STATE OF FLORIDA ; LE`vilS WOLVERTON ; HUBER PLUl~IBII'JG ; P. S. L.
COI,TITRY TREAT ; and FT . PIERCE UTILITIES AUTHORITY .
2. That this Court has jurisdiction of the parties in this
cause and the subject matter.
- 3. That the Court, having hear~ the argument of the attorney
for the Plaintiffs, and noting the failure of the attorneys
' for the Defendants who had filed answers to the Plaintiffs' Com-
- ~
BOOK346 P~GE ~3
~