HomeMy WebLinkAbout1891.
, _
IN THE CIP.CUI~' COU~T G~ TNE 19T~[
JU~ICIAL CIi~CUI'r , Iiv APiD ~'OR
ST. LUCIE COUNTY. I~LORIDA _:
CASE i~0. 3U-577-CA
DIAi~E ZOGEItS . )
Plaintiff, )
vs. ~ ORDLR
JA-~IES RE~'ELLE and ~EVL- LLE RiALiY ,)
individually and as agen~ €or
the unknown owner ot 701 S. )
Ocean Drive, Fort Pierce, FL, )
Def endant s . )
THI5 CAUSE CUMI::G before the Court or~ the llefendants'
i:otion to Dismiss~ and to ~~ua~h, an3 on the Plaintiffs' motior_
for leave to Amend, tnis Court having heard arguunent of counsei
and being full~ advised in th2 preaaises, it is hereby,
ORD~RED E~tJD AJJL'DGEil : -
~e.~~~°~~
1. Defendants' motion to quash is 3is~ri~~~.
2. llefendants' motion to dis:aiss is gratiteu with leave to
amend J~~ ~G~~"~l~Q~~? ~`--..-~l~- ~ r ~-
v ~
3. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend _is grar.te3, a:id
the Defendants are given ten(10) days after service of t:ie
anended complaint to answer said coraplaint.
~vld~ F;'B O~ERED this ~p~~ay o f January, 19b1 .
%
. . _ ~ ~ 1 ,~2 '
CIRCUIT COLY.T - GE
Copies furnished to:
Cynthia Grooans-:~farvin , Esq .
Douglas E. Canano, Esq.
5~~4
I~~1 ,' ~:~ i 4. .~~ 3- 07
• ~ e e.nL ~: ; ,.~~~_ ::
C: '~j:.i2 ~~.r~i.'{.l~i•
~'1i(~iE~ ~t'il i !!1.5
.. ~.L: : K C~, rt1:T _ -"~ /
O
- - _ -__~~_-_.
~~k 3 S~ ~ ~~- ~gg ~ .