HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975
STANLEY 1UCI~R and AiARY
TUCI~R, his wife,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
S[lN BA~~IICS OF FIARILIA, INC. ,
etc., et al,
Defendants .
513~495
/
IN 'I~IE CIRCUIT COURT OF 'I1~ NINEfF.EMH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AIVD FOR SI'. 1.UCIF
CQ1M'Y, FLORIDA
CASE N0. 79-571 CA
ORDER
'I1-lIS CAUSE came on to be heard on Decernber ~22, 1980, and cotu~sel
having full opportunity to pi•esent argi.anent and the Couf~t being otherwise
fully advised in the premises, it is
ORDERID an3 4D~I[IDGED that Defendants rbtion for Continuance
is hereby denied. It is further
ORDERED and AQIUDGED that Defendant's ~iARLFS BLOOM's, objection
to Plaintiffs' request to produce the Defendant's co~lete e~loyee record
file with Si.m Bank of~St. Lucie, Inc., is hereby denied, and said fi2e will
be made available to the Plaintiffs at the Sim Bank, Ft. Pierce, St. Lucie
Coi.mty, Florida. Further, the Defendant's objection to Plaintiffs request
to produce any statements given by him to any internal bank investigator '
or any police concerning the incident at issue, is hereby sustained.
DONE an ORDERID in Chambers, at Fort Pierce, St. Lucie Cowzty,
Florida, thi~~ ay of ~~~~- , 19 1 _
... - i ~- .
i7 /
~ CI E" ' ~ ~
Copy furnished attorneys on attached list
~^
ao~z 3~S PAGE 19~71.