HomeMy WebLinkAbout2888
514043
nJ ~ ci~.vrr ooc~ oF ~ ~
JUDICIAL CII~.UIT IN ArID~ FO~t ST. I~ICIE
QO[R~Tl'Y, F'IARmA
CASE N0. 80-247 CA
C~EtAID FRI~I, M. D . ,
Plaintiff,
vs.
~IC7~1N VAN & S'I~O~,
Il~C. ,
Defendant.
/
OROER DFNYING D~'II~IDANP' S N17~IQ~i Z~0 DISNIISS
14iIS CA[)SE having vane on to be . heard t~on Defendant' s
Nbtio~ to Disniss, and the Plaintiff, C~tAIa FRIII~1, 2~I.D. , having been
represented by Ralph L. Flo~wers, F.9quire, ani the Defetx3ant, A1~tIC~N VAN
& SPORP~GE, II~C., having beer- r~resented by r!larvin i. M~ss, Esquire, and
Ja¢nes T. Walker, Esquire, and the Oourt having heard testiutnny and havirig
reoeived briefs on the matter, and being othenaise fully advised in the
premises, it is thereupon ~
ORUII2'E~ and ADJiIDC~) that the Defetxiant's Nbtion to Dismiss
be and th~e same is hereby d~enied. . This Court is ~t boalnd by precedent
established by 1vw~er ~ederal Courts. (See State v. Dwyer, 332 So.2d 333
(Supr~~ Court 1976.) Hawever, this oider is withaut prejudice for the
Defend~nt, AI~ItICAN VAN & S'I~DRAGE, INC. , to aqain raise the question of
punitiv~e damages at the trial.
DOI~ AI~ID ORDII2ID in Chaanbers, at Fort Pierve, St. I~ucie
Co~uity, Florida, this 15th day of JanuaYy, 1981.
~
~ n ,
/
~
.
~,
/ , C]
~14~43
Capies furnish~ed t~o:
Ralph L. Flowers, Fsq.
M3Niri I . IrbSS ~ Esq .
Ja~nes T. Walker, Esc;.
1981 J~M t 6~.~; i!= 39
~I:.EC tNC FrCUdUt 0 •
S R GER POITRAS~~
c~EaK cu~cu~T cou r ~ ~
4f~C~R~'.'~ R~~ . _ __ ~- - _ .
g~34s ~2883 ;
~,