Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1312514919 . S[7N BANK OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, Plaintiff, vs. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINE'!'EEATPH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY, STATF. OF FIARIDA. CASE NO. 79-367 CA ~ ) ) ) ) ~ ) ) ) ) ) STANLEY TUC1~R and MARY TUCKER, his wife, ~ Defendants. FINAL JUbGMENT THIS CAUSE came on to be heard before the Court without the intervention of a jury and the Court makes the following findings: 1. That on October 9, 1979, the Final Judgment was entered against the Defendant, STANLEY TUCKER, in favor of the Plaintiff herein in the amount of $2,739.59 on a Master Charge Account No. 53495-1616-015755.and_the amount of $15,537.67 on a promissory note, together with attorneys' fees of $4,661.30 and costs of $61.50 and this Court takes judicial notice of the same. 2. The Court further finds that the Defendant, MARY TUCKER, is indebted to the Plaintiff, SUN BANK OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, in the same amount of $2,739.59 on the same Master Charge Account No. 53495-1616-015755, together with interest in the amount of S623.10 and in the amount of $15,000.00 on the same promissory note together with interest in the amount of $2,471.49 and costs of $76.00. It is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudqed that the Plaintiff, SiIN BANK OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, does hereby recover from said Defendant, MARY TUCKER, the sum of $20,834.18 together with costs in this behalf expended and herein ta~ced at $76.00. It is further, considered, ordered and adjudged: That in light of the previous Final Judgment entered against the Defendant, STANLEY TUCKER, herein that any sums recovered under said judgment against the Defendant, STANLEY TUCKER, shall, to the extent applicable, be credited against this Final Judgment against MARY TtJCKER, as well. It is further considered, ordered and adjudqed That the Court reserves jurisdiction for the purposes of awarding attorneys' fees after appropriate hearing by the parties. $(li~tJZ~ ~~~~ ~ 3 x. _..-. . .. .~._ e._.. . ~. -. ~ _ . ?.:-.... ~