HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973! +~
that the automobile itself was used in some manner to cause or
produce the injury.
In conclusion we hold that the fact that an automobile
was used to transport the assailant to the scene and the fact~that
the gvn c•~hich arou'wced the injuay was thereafter fired from such automo-
bile do ~ot constitute sufficient circumstances to establish a
.
causal relationship between the use of the automobile and the
injury for purposes of invoking the automobile liability insurance
coverage of the assailant. -
Accordingly, this c~'ause is reversed with directions that
judgment be entered for the appellant.
.
~
_
t
~
.t
LETTS, C.J., and MOORE, J., concur.
r
a
~y~r -r _ .. _
. a~T-~~•"''~_.~3a#'°..c~' .Y ...+.
-5-
~8I Ja~ 30 ~? I= 00
ci~EO aNr F~coH.~ cr. -
St.LUCIf CBUYiY.f1...
ROGER t'OItRAS ,
CLERK CIRCUiT CCU3T~
:,.f~,,. ,~~ •,.s~: ~_
5153-29
~
;
~
~
~
~
~
y
}
. S~NIK 347 PAGf ~~~
' #
t
1
3
_ _ r~ ~~
, -,., z~ .Y
f{'i l~