Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout237051560~ TNOMAS CLARK and DORENE CLARK, Plaintiff, vs. PEERLESS INSURANCE COMAPNY, Defendant. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 19TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 80 554 CA O R D E R THIS CAUSE having come on before the Court on the Motion of the Def~ to Dismiss and Motion having considered the being otherwise fully hereby andant, PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY, to Compel Arbitration, and the Court same, the arguments of counsel and advised in the premises, it is . ~. ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Motion to Dismiss is denied as to the issue raised upon Count Two of the Complaint; 2. That the issues of damages and the Motion to Compel are hereby abated until the Court has determined the issue of coverage raised by the Defendant. DONE AND ORDE in Chambers at Vero Beach, Florida on this (7~ - da1 of January, 1981. - , ° > / ~ ~ / I JUDGE " HONORABLE CHARLES E. SMITH Copies furnished to: Robert.J. Gorman, Esquire Lorenzo Williams, Esquire 515601 1981 F~:~ -2 ~~ ~: 48 si'~t c f ct~r+ °Y ~i°n. fiOGER P(;ItRAS CLERK C~RC:1;T ^CCUg~ ~~, ;r:r. •. ~ -~ C~ .. ~.. ~ ~.~ _ - ~~~~.~.~z_::~..~ _ ~.~. _y . . _ e~.~x347 p~~2~364 ~ -_ : ~~~ ~~ ~~~ .