HomeMy WebLinkAbout2059
51bi811
IN TFfli CIRCIIIT OOl1RT OF 'IHE:
NIN~'I'IilNft~ .II~ICIAI. C1RC1)IT,
IN R~~'D FOR ST. I.UCIF: (701~TIY,
FI~RIQA.
GA.SF. .'V0. : i 9 571 CA
S1:ANI.EY 7'll(:1QiR AI~R1 MAI2Y TU(:IQ:R,
hiti wife,
Plaintiffs,
~'ti • r I N.~1L .IIJD(~~NT
~
SI11f B.4.v1~ OF ST. LIK:Ii: COUvTY,
l.'tiAR1.I:S BLOEI~i, IA1fE (bRBITf,
and OORBITT SEC11Ft1'IY A,~'D PATR01.
C~O. , INC.
Defendant~.
/
THIS CAU,SI: cvne on thi~ ciay for I~inal J~idgment and it appearing
to thc Court that a j ury hav ing becn hel-etofol-e impanc• 1 ec] and sworn in
.iccordance with law, and after }-aving heard the evidence, the argwnents
of coimsel, and r~ceiving the.charge of the Court, 1-etiring to consicier
their verdict, and returning to the open court, rendered the followin~ ~
verdirt :
"~~c, the Jt~ry, find as follow~:
Section A
1. n~a rtr-. Bloc}un corrmit an assault again~t Stanley
fucker?
Yes No X
2. D i d b11- . Bloehm comn-i t an assaul t aga inst Atary
Tuckci-?
Ycs ~o ?i
3. Dicl l~ir. Corbitt comnit an assault against Stanley
Tuckcr?
Yes ~'o X
4. [licl Ah•. Corbitt comnit an assault against tif~~ry
'I'ucker?
Yc ~ No X
B:~'~;349 p~~E2i158 . .
_~
~-~. _ - _ _ ~,-