HomeMy WebLinkAbout0644. ~
519'700
n~ ~ ci;~rr oo~s a~ ~ ~~
~vnic~ cu~.vrr c~ r~o~unA, n~ ~uvn
~ox sr. wc~ axmrr~r.
CASE NO. 79-367 CA
StR~I BANK QF ST. I~ICIE OaII~Tl'Y. )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs. )
)
STArII~Y Z[IC'~3t and MAR7l )
~R, his wife, )
)
Defendants. )
O~iUER Q~1 M~ION Z~0 WI`I~IDRAW
Zhis ca~e vaning on to be heard ai Motion to Witlxiraw of the I~w
Firnn of Farish, Farish & Rcmani., and after due notioe and the vremises beirxx
oorLSidered, it is hereby
O~ ArD Aia7t)DC',ID that the Law Fixm of Farish, Farish & Romani be
and is her~ry alla~aed to withd~r~ as ooun.sel for the Defendants, STAI~IIEY
Z[JC~t and MARY ~7C~t, his wife.
DOI~ AI~ID OR~ at Ft. Pieroe, St. Lucie Qowity, Florida, this the
lOth day of March , A.D.,1981.
/~ i '
!/~
~
t Judc~e
Q~y furnished :
Daiglas E. Thom~son, Fsc~ire
Frederick W. Leonhardt, Esquire
Stanley Tucker arxi Mary Tucker
51y'7UU
19N MAR 10 PM 1= OT
s~~'~€'h`$'dic r~A~"-
aE~ac ciRCU~ t
ac~~:•~ ~~. a~t ~s ~_~~~~- -
~~;~~
""350 r~~~E 644