HomeMy WebLinkAbout1454
5:dU'196
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY.
FLORI Drl .
CASE NO. 79-400
WILLIAM H. AMES and MARGARET A.
AMES. his wife,
Cownterplaintiffs,
vs.
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY,
Counterdefendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
This cause coming on for trial before a Jury which was duly sworn
and heard the evidence presented to them and which rendered the
following verdict:
VERDICT
We, the Jury. find as follows:
1. Was there negligence on the part of the Coun terdefendant.
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY?
YES X ~fl
2. Was there negligence on the part of Counterplaintiff, WILLIAM
H. tu'~S; w!!1(`?1 r.7aC ? ~Pb~~ ~$L~° v^~ a*..~i~ ~aiuan~c~
,YES X NO
3. State the percentage of any negligence which was a legal cause
of damage to Counterplaintiff, WILLiAM H. AMES, that you attribute to:
Counterplaintiff, WILLIAM H. A.MES 60 %
Counterdefendant, FLORIDA EAST COAST
RAILWAY COMPANY 40 ~~~
Total Must Be 100_ _ %
4. WhaC is the total amount of any damages sustained by
Counterplaintiffs~ WILLIAM N. AMES and MARGARET A. AMES, caused by
the incident_in question?
WILLIAM H. AMES $ 105,000.00
MARGARET A. AMES $ 5,000.00
SO SAY WE ALL.
DATED THIS lOth day of March, 1981.
/s! GENE G. PI~K~T~
oreperson
Gene G. Pickett
f~Y,~
n^'!K i'~