HomeMy WebLinkAbout2805.
5;~2599
IN TNE CIRCUIT OOURT OF' Tf~E
r1ING"TFENTFi JUDICIA[, CIRCUIT
It~l Q~m FOR ST. ! I~CIE COUNTY,
F'LGRIDR .
CASE N0. 75-330 FR
THELA D. FIIL'~n'C~D,
Petitioner,
v.
nEN~dIE FUL'r:00U,
n~~ :-::~~r
. . ,... ~,... ....,. . „ .
~
. ~ ORDF.R
T'tfi~ CE~ii~~: havi-~ cor~e on *o be hearc: u~en the irdife's -'~otior. to
Dis.^.:iss Hasbar.d's Complaint for '-bd1flC~tioi~ and Wife's ?~Iotice of i~e-~ri~
set for February 2s, 1?81, at ll:45 a.m., 3nd the Court h~vin~ been other-
wise f~ally advised in the premises~, it is
•~.T~+DEpED and ADJCTty,'~;p that thP r:ife's i~r.~*ion to Dismis~ E-»>sbanci's
Co^':D1~12?L for '•°,odification is Y:erPby kTr~nted and it is fl.r*her
CRDER~G ar:d ADJUIYsED that rhP ~,art Y;ili r.ot entFrtain ~ Perition
!'OC` :'''.Od1f1C?r 1~7ri ?.!1t1I th~' L?L:S~';iC?:~ ~~~?i:":I~ F'_'Lt:lh'~i ~ 1S currer~~t 1C: h15
~rr~araaes, it is further
C??DERED AriG ~ DJ',!IY7~D tt:~t a Petition for '~"~~+ific~tior, ~:il~ r.~* be
er.tertained b;r tY:P Co~~:rt ur.til thFre h=~s been a c.han~-e ir: circ~a^~~stances
~ince the h~arir~ on J2!:~.~aC'y 14, 1981.
DO':F. A?.D ORDFRED in ~~1~~/ , ,
F~ori~a, this~~jr-p~ day of '.3rcr-, 1481.
~"___
~, . .
;. KR'•iDA: :5 . , P, _irc~ait ud~e
~pies f~:rnished to:
R,~pert J~~sPr. :~mith, Esn. rJi~ii~J9~
!~:i j~'•?~!'~ F. . FO!^~ ~ ~.5,^~ ,
19$I A° ;- I 1.h -~ 49
f~': FC ~hf ~t CCra t :;
• s~ ~t,~,if re;;y~r.1~a
FtCGrf? t'CtiR; S
:ILhX CI~~U~' C~,,R~ -
~ . Jo
5u:~~X ~~~ P~Gf ~'~lJU1