HomeMy WebLinkAbout2826.
52;~612
STANLEY TUCKER and MARY
TUCKER, his wife,
Plaintiffs,
-vs-
SUN BANKS OF FLORIDA, INC.,
et al,
Defendants.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
NINETEEP~TH JUDUCIAL CIRCUIT IN
AND FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
CASE NO: 79-571-CA
DIRECTED VERDICT AND JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT
ON PUNITIVE DAMAGE AND SEPARATE ENTITY ISSUES
Defendants, Sun Banks of Florida, Inc., and Sun Bank of
St. Lucie County, Inc., having moved for a directed ver~ict in
their favor and against plaintiffs on the issues of an award
of punitive damages against these defendants and to plaintiffs,
and concerning the question of whether the separate entities.of .
these two corporate defendants should be ignored, thereby treating
them as one corporation, an~ the Court having heard the evidence
presented by plaintiffs on these issues, and hearing the argument of
COUflSE'l, after rnnSZ~p~3tIQ.^,~ ~~ IS ;,^v4:~ ~t'iciciOrc~
ORDERED.an3 ADJUDGED:
1. A directed verdict is entered in favor of said defendants
and against plaintiffs on the above issues.
1. Judgment in favor of defendants on said issues is hereby
entered, and plaintiffs shall go hence without day as to said issues,
concerning these defendants.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambe in St. Lucie County, Florida,
th i s ~? da o f I( ,~
y ~ , 1981.
522612 ~ ' ~ ,, ; ~
~ / ~ .
1981 ~i ~- I h;: "~ 56 ci cuit ge
rt~ ~c ent =~ ~o~ :~: -
:T.LU::IE CLiJ~TY.f :~;.
fCG: R F'(;IIf~.`.`.i
CLf FR C:f'~.~;~ : ~~~~ j?
. _ . , .~ ' r~ ~'
rl
L~~;351 ~~~E2822